Tactical 17.07.2019

Project Updates

Purpose: Develop a Vibrant Network

  • Work until 4:00 pm CET

  • Community

    • Facilitate group communication (chat, forum, newsletter etc) by Max – some interesting conversation in the chat

    • Create information flows (wiki, map) by Max – we'll have the research group call just after ours

    • Establish processes within the network (meetups, media) by Ela – nice group energy emerging, we can build on that

  • Co-Create Events

    • Web3 dgov track by Max – 50%+ agenda filled, more then enough in the process, i also try to request funding $2-4k from aragon and dao stack if needed (for recordings, flat, freebies and potentially 3 free tickets)

    • Retreat in Ljubljana by Anja – was at the place, looks great, helpful people – will arrange everything. There would be a bday, but we'll tackle this. Concept paper looks great

    • Dgov track and devcon by Max – checked Lane's vision, it's only for 3 hours and already filled with content. Asked how to help but no ideas for now.

  • Launch dgov experiments

    • Funding with Seed DAO by Tim – we have a first iteration of the document, Ela has created a table of contents. There's also content we should dive into. Need a session to distribute the work. Have a look at the document. Maybe Phoebe can PM


Tim / My help with Seed DAO needed?

Ela: would like to see how you structure the document. What are the contents that are not clear yet? E.g. membership program, roles etc – need to look deeper into that. To see whether you feel comfortable. Nothing specific for you input. But we need to find the work rhythm.

Max / Feedback on the web3 agenda

Please provide and advice who we should ask

Ela / What is the common goal? Worried about the funding without the strategy

It's an ongoing thing. The more i'm engaging with the group the more I get the sense of the common goal. It's not documented or mapped down, but it's there. Trust we can get there through the collab work.

Martin: like the approach of letting things come. But would be nice to see what established practices we like to evaluate and know if things don't go so well.

Ela: is it about the content.

Martin: rather peer reviewing, as the process.

Ela: nice practice.

Phoebe: resonate with Martin. That's the idea behind the dgov Handbook. Using going horizontal as the framework. Linked resource for the process.

Martin: would love to peer review the handbook. (Phoebe will share).

Phoebe / Feedback on the paper for the retreat

Take the look and comment on the paper

Phoebe / When we're on top – what do we do with the rest of the time

Anja: what do you propose? Like short meetings

Phoebe: short meeting is ok. Have a reflection.

Max: right, while somebody wants to drive. E.g. mediation or what we can improve

Ela: like that,

Martin: should appreciate this. Liks short and sweet. But also can go through the team improvement, if we want.

Phoebe / Where do i feel the most empowered with dgov?

Take for yourself